Fault localization in large-scale network policy deployment

ABSTRACT

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for localizing faults in a network policy are disclosed. In some examples, a system or method can obtain TCAM rules across a network and use the TCAM rules to perform an equivalency check between the logical model and the hardware model of the network policy. One or more risk models are annotated with output from the equivalency check and the risk models are used to identify a set of policy objects of the network policy that are likely responsible for the faults.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The instant Application is a divisional, and claims priority, toapplication Ser. No. 15/719,139 entitled FAULT LOCALIZATION INLARGE-SCALE NETWORK POLICY DEPLOYMENT filed Sep. 28, 2017, which claimsthe benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/513,093entitled FAULT LOCALIZATION IN LARGE-SCALE NETWORK POLICY DEPLOYMENTfiled May 31, 2017, the contents of which are incorporated herein byreference in their entireties.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present technology pertains to network configuration andtroubleshooting, and more specifically to automatically localize faultsin network policies deployed within a network.

BACKGROUND

Network configurations for large data center networks are oftenspecified at a centralized controller. The controller can programswitches, routers, servers, and elements in the network according to thespecified network configurations. Network configurations are inherentlyvery complex, and involve low level as well as high level configurationsof several layers of the network such as access policies, forwardingpolicies, routing policies, security policies, QoS policies, etc. Givensuch complexity, the network configuration process is error prone. Inmany cases, the configurations defined on a controller, which canreflect an intent specification for the network, can contain errors andinconsistencies that are often extremely difficult to identify and maycreate significant problems in the network.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and otheradvantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a moreparticular description of the principles briefly described above will berendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which areillustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawingsdepict only exemplary embodiments of the disclosure and are nottherefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the principlesherein are described and explained with additional specificity anddetail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:

FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate example network environments;

FIG. 2A illustrates an example object model for a network;

FIG. 2B illustrates an example object model for a tenant object in theexample object model from FIG. 2A;

FIG. 2C illustrates an example association of various objects in theexample object model from FIG. 2A;

FIG. 2D illustrates a schematic diagram of example models forimplementing the example object model from FIG. 2A;

FIG. 3A illustrates an example network assurance appliance;

FIG. 3B illustrates an example system for network assurance;

FIG. 3C illustrates an example system for static policy analysis in anetwork;

FIG. 4 illustrates an example method embodiment for network assurance;

FIG. 5 illustrates an example method or process for localizing faults ina network policy implemented within a network;

FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate example risk models;

FIG. 7 illustrates an example network device in accordance with variousembodiments; and

FIG. 8 illustrates an example computing device in accordance withvarious embodiments.

DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Various embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below.While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understoodthat this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled inthe relevant art will recognize that other components and configurationsmay be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

Various embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below.While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understoodthat this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled inthe relevant art will recognize that other components and configurationsmay be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.Thus, the following description and drawings are illustrative and arenot to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are describedto provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, incertain instances, well-known or conventional details are not describedin order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or anembodiment in the present disclosure can be references to the sameembodiment or any embodiment; and, such references mean at least one ofthe embodiments.

Reference to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particularfeature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with theembodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. Theappearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in thespecification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment,nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of otherembodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may beexhibited by some embodiments and not by others.

The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinarymeanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in thespecific context where each term is used. Alternative language andsynonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein,and no special significance should be placed upon whether or not a termis elaborated or discussed herein. In some cases, synonyms for certainterms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not excludethe use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in thisspecification including examples of any terms discussed herein isillustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope andmeaning of the disclosure or of any example term. Likewise, thedisclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in thisspecification.

Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples ofinstruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according tothe embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note thattitles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of areader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unlessotherwise defined, technical and scientific terms used herein have themeaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art towhich this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the presentdocument, including definitions will control.

Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forthin the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from thedescription, or can be learned by practice of the herein disclosedprinciples. The features and advantages of the disclosure can berealized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinationsparticularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and otherfeatures of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from thefollowing description and appended claims, or can be learned by thepractice of the principles set forth herein.

Overview

Disclosed herein are systems, methods, and computer-readable media forlocalizing faults. The systems, methods, and computer-readable mediainclude identifying, using at least one processing device, a failure ina network comprising a plurality of network devices and a controller formanaging a network policy deployed throughout the network, the networkpolicy associated with a plurality of objects, wherein each object ofthe plurality of objects is a manageable component that impacts hownetwork traffic is treated by at least one network device of theplurality of network devices. The systems, methods, andcomputer-readable media further include determining from the pluralityof objects, using the at least one processing device, a set of objectsthat are indicative of the failure in the network.

Description

The disclosed technology addresses the need in the art for identifyingfaults within the implementation of a network policy across a network.The present technology involves system, methods, and computer-readablemedia for identifying faults within network policies implemented in anetwork. The present technology will be described in the followingdisclosure as follows. The discussion begins with an introductorydiscussion of network assurance and a description of example computingenvironments, as illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B. A discussion of networkmodels for network assurance, as shown in FIGS. 2A through 2D, andnetwork assurance systems and methods, as shown in FIGS. 3A-3C, 4, 5,6A-6B, 7, and 8 will then follow. The discussion concludes with adescription of an example network device, as illustrated in FIG. 7, andan example computing device, as illustrated in FIG. 8, including examplehardware components suitable for hosting software applications andperforming computing operations. The disclosure now turns to anintroductory discussion of network assurance.

Network assurance is the guarantee or determination that the network isbehaving as intended by the network operator and has been configuredproperly (e.g., the network is doing what it is intended to do). Intentcan encompass various network operations, such as bridging, routing,security, service chaining, endpoints, compliance, QoS (Quality ofService), audits, etc. Intent can be embodied in one or more policies,settings, configurations, etc., defined for the network and individualnetwork elements (e.g., switches, routers, applications, resources,etc.). However, often times, the configurations, policies, etc., definedby a network operator are incorrect or not accurately reflected in theactual behavior of the network. For example, a network operatorspecifies a configuration A for one or more types of traffic but laterfinds out that the network is actually applying configuration B to thattraffic or otherwise processing that traffic in a manner that isinconsistent with configuration A. This can be a result of manydifferent causes, such as hardware errors, software bugs, varyingpriorities, configuration conflicts, misconfiguration of one or moresettings, improper rule rendering by devices, unexpected errors orevents, software upgrades, configuration changes, failures, etc. Asanother example, a network operator implements configuration C but oneor more other configurations result in the network behaving in a mannerthat is inconsistent with the intent reflected by the implementation ofconfiguration C. For example, such a situation can result whenconfiguration C conflicts with other configurations in the network.

The approaches herein can provide network assurance by modeling variousaspects of the network and/or performing consistency checks as well asother network assurance checks. The network assurance approaches hereincan be implemented in various types of networks, including a privatenetwork, such as a local area network (LAN); an enterprise network; astandalone or traditional network, such as a data center network; anetwork including a physical or underlay layer and a logical or overlaylayer, such as a VXLAN or software-defined network (SDN) (e.g.,Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) or VMware NSX networks); etc.

Network models can be constructed for a network and implemented fornetwork assurance. A network model can provide a representation of oneor more aspects of a network, including, without limitation thenetwork's policies, configurations, requirements, security, routing,topology, applications, hardware, filters, contracts, access controllists, infrastructure, etc. As will be further explained below,different types of models can be generated for a network.

Such models can be implemented to ensure that the behavior of thenetwork will be consistent (or is consistent) with the intended behaviorreflected through specific configurations (e.g., policies, settings,definitions, etc.) implemented by the network operator. Unliketraditional network monitoring, which involves sending and analyzingdata packets and observing network behavior, network assurance can beperformed through modeling without necessarily ingesting packet data ormonitoring traffic or network behavior. This can result in foresight,insight, and hindsight: problems can be prevented before they occur,identified when they occur, and fixed immediately after they occur.

Thus, network assurance can involve modeling properties of the networkto deterministically predict the behavior of the network. The networkcan be determined to be healthy if the model(s) indicate proper behavior(e.g., no inconsistencies, conflicts, errors, etc.). The network can bedetermined to be functional, but not fully healthy, if the modelingindicates proper behavior but some inconsistencies. The network can bedetermined to be non-functional and not healthy if the modelingindicates improper behavior and errors. If inconsistencies or errors aredetected by the modeling, a detailed analysis of the correspondingmodel(s) can allow one or more underlying or root problems to beidentified with great accuracy.

The modeling can consume numerous types of smart events which model alarge amount of behavioral aspects of the network. Smart events canimpact various aspects of the network, such as underlay services,overlay services, tenant connectivity, tenant security, tenant end point(EP) mobility, tenant policy, tenant routing, resources, etc.

Having described various aspects of network assurance, the disclosurenow turns to a discussion of example network environments for networkassurance.

FIG. 1A illustrates a diagram of an example Network Environment 100,such as a data center. The Network Environment 100 can include a Fabric120 which can represent the physical layer or infrastructure (e.g.,underlay) of the Network Environment 100. Fabric 120 can include Spines102 (e.g., spine routers or switches) and Leafs 104 (e.g., leaf routersor switches) which can be interconnected for routing or switchingtraffic in the Fabric 120. Spines 102 can interconnect Leafs 104 in theFabric 120, and Leafs 104 can connect the Fabric 120 to an overlay orlogical portion of the Network Environment 100, which can includeapplication services, servers, virtual machines, containers, endpoints,etc. Thus, network connectivity in the Fabric 120 can flow from Spines102 to Leafs 104, and vice versa. The interconnections between Leafs 104and Spines 102 can be redundant (e.g., multiple interconnections) toavoid a failure in routing. In some embodiments, Leafs 104 and Spines102 can be fully connected, such that any given Leaf is connected toeach of the Spines 102, and any given Spine is connected to each of theLeafs 104. Leafs 104 can be, for example, top-of-rack (“ToR”) switches,aggregation switches, gateways, ingress and/or egress switches, provideredge devices, and/or any other type of routing or switching device.

Leafs 104 can be responsible for routing and/or bridging tenant orcustomer packets and applying network policies or rules. Networkpolicies and rules can be driven by one or more Controllers 116, and/orimplemented or enforced by one or more devices, such as Leafs 104. Leafs104 can connect other elements to the Fabric 120. For example, Leafs 104can connect Servers 106, Hypervisors 108, Virtual Machines (VMs) 110,Applications 112, Network Device 114, etc., with Fabric 120. Suchelements can reside in one or more logical or virtual layers ornetworks, such as an overlay network. In some cases, Leafs 104 canencapsulate and decapsulate packets to and from such elements (e.g.,Servers 106) in order to enable communications throughout NetworkEnvironment 100 and Fabric 120. Leafs 104 can also provide any otherdevices, services, tenants, or workloads with access to Fabric 120. Insome cases, Servers 106 connected to Leafs 104 can similarly encapsulateand decapsulate packets to and from Leafs 104. For example, Servers 106can include one or more virtual switches or routers or tunnel endpointsfor tunneling packets between an overlay or logical layer hosted by, orconnected to, Servers 106 and an underlay layer represented by Fabric120 and accessed via Leafs 104.

Applications 112 can include software applications, services,containers, appliances, functions, service chains, etc. For example,Applications 112 can include a firewall, a database, a CDN server, anIDS/IPS, a deep packet inspection service, a message router, a virtualswitch, etc. An application from Applications 112 can be distributed,chained, or hosted by multiple endpoints (e.g., Servers 106, VMs 110,etc.), or may run or execute entirely from a single endpoint.

VMs 110 can be virtual machines hosted by Hypervisors 108 or virtualmachine managers running on Servers 106. VMs 110 can include workloadsrunning on a guest operating system on a respective server. Hypervisors108 can provide a layer of software, firmware, and/or hardware thatcreates, manages, and/or runs the VMs 110. Hypervisors 108 can allow VMs110 to share hardware resources on Servers 106, and the hardwareresources on Servers 106 to appear as multiple, separate hardwareplatforms. Moreover, Hypervisors 108 on Servers 106 can host one or moreVMs 110.

In some cases, VMs 110 and/or Hypervisors 108 can be migrated to otherServers 106. Servers 106 can similarly be migrated to other locations inNetwork Environment 100. For example, a server connected to a specificleaf can be changed to connect to a different or additional leaf. Suchconfiguration or deployment changes can involve modifications tosettings, configurations and policies that are applied to the resourcesbeing migrated as well as other network components.

In some cases, one or more Servers 106, Hypervisors 108, and/or VMs 110can represent or reside in a tenant or customer space. Tenant space caninclude workloads, services, applications, devices, networks, and/orresources that are associated with one or more clients or subscribers.Accordingly, traffic in Network Environment 100 can be routed based onspecific tenant policies, spaces, agreements, configurations, etc.Moreover, addressing can vary between one or more tenants. In someconfigurations, tenant spaces can be divided into logical segmentsand/or networks and separated from logical segments and/or networksassociated with other tenants. Addressing, policy, security andconfiguration information between tenants can be managed by Controllers116, Servers 106, Leafs 104, etc.

Configurations in Network Environment 100 can be implemented at alogical level, a hardware level (e.g., physical), and/or both. Forexample, configurations can be implemented at a logical and/or hardwarelevel based on endpoint or resource attributes, such as endpoint typesand/or application groups or profiles, through a software-definednetwork (SDN) framework (e.g., Application-Centric Infrastructure (ACI)or VMWARE NSX). To illustrate, one or more administrators can defineconfigurations at a logical level (e.g., application or software level)through Controllers 116, which can implement or propagate suchconfigurations through Network Environment 100. In some examples,Controllers 116 can be Application Policy Infrastructure Controllers(APICs) in an ACI framework. In other examples, Controllers 116 can beone or more management components for associated with other SDNsolutions, such as NSX Managers.

Such configurations can define rules, policies, priorities, protocols,attributes, objects, etc., for routing and/or classifying traffic inNetwork Environment 100. For example, such configurations can defineattributes and objects for classifying and processing traffic based onEndpoint Groups (EPGs), Security Groups (SGs), VM types, bridge domains(BDs), virtual routing and forwarding instances (VRFs), tenants,priorities, firewall rules, etc. Other example network objects andconfigurations are further described below. Traffic policies and rulescan be enforced based on tags, attributes, or other characteristics ofthe traffic, such as protocols associated with the traffic, EPGsassociated with the traffic, SGs associated with the traffic, networkaddress information associated with the traffic, etc. Such policies andrules can be enforced by one or more elements in Network Environment100, such as Leafs 104, Servers 106, Hypervisors 108, Controllers 116,etc. As previously explained, Network Environment 100 can be configuredaccording to one or more particular software-defined network (SDN)solutions, such as CISCO ACI or VMWARE NSX. These example SDN solutionsare briefly described below.

ACI can provide an application-centric or policy-based solution throughscalable distributed enforcement. ACI supports integration of physicaland virtual environments under a declarative configuration model fornetworks, servers, services, security, requirements, etc. For example,the ACI framework implements EPGs, which can include a collection ofendpoints or applications that share common configuration requirements,such as security, QoS, services, etc. Endpoints can be virtual/logicalor physical devices, such as VMs, containers, hosts, or physical serversthat are connected to Network Environment 100. Endpoints can have one ormore attributes such as a VM name, guest OS name, a security tag,application profile, etc. Application configurations can be appliedbetween EPGs, instead of endpoints directly, in the form of contracts.Leafs 104 can classify incoming traffic into different EPGs. Theclassification can be based on, for example, a network segmentidentifier such as a VLAN ID, VXLAN Network Identifier (VNID), NVGREVirtual Subnet Identifier (VSID), MAC address, IP address, etc.

In some cases, classification in the ACI infrastructure can beimplemented by Application Virtual Switches (AVS), which can run on ahost, such as a server or switch. For example, an AVS can classifytraffic based on specified attributes, and tag packets of differentattribute EPGs with different identifiers, such as network segmentidentifiers (e.g., VLAN ID). Finally, Leafs 104 can tie packets withtheir attribute EPGs based on their identifiers and enforce policies,which can be implemented and/or managed by one or more Controllers 116.Leaf 104 can classify to which EPG the traffic from a host belongs andenforce policies accordingly.

Another example SDN solution is based on VMWARE NSX. With VMWARE NSX,hosts can run a distributed firewall (DFW) which can classify andprocess traffic. Consider a case where three types of VMs, namely,application, database and web VMs, are put into a single layer-2 networksegment. Traffic protection can be provided within the network segmentbased on the VM type. For example, HTTP traffic can be allowed among webVMs, and disallowed between a web VM and an application or database VM.To classify traffic and implement policies, VMWARE NSX can implementsecurity groups, which can be used to group the specific VMs (e.g., webVMs, application VMs, database VMs). DFW rules can be configured toimplement policies for the specific security groups. To illustrate, inthe context of the previous example, DFW rules can be configured toblock HTTP traffic between web, application, and database securitygroups.

Returning now to FIG. 1A, Network Environment 100 can deploy differenthosts via Leafs 104, Servers 106, Hypervisors 108, VMs 110, Applications112, and Controllers 116, such as VMWARE ESXi hosts, WINDOWS HYPER-Vhosts, bare metal physical hosts, etc. Network Environment 100 mayinteroperate with a variety of Hypervisors 108, Servers 106 (e.g.,physical and/or virtual servers), SDN orchestration platforms, etc.Network Environment 100 may implement a declarative model to allow itsintegration with application design and holistic network policy.

Controllers 116 can provide centralized access to fabric information,application configuration, resource configuration, application-levelconfiguration modeling for a software-defined network (SDN)infrastructure, integration with management systems or servers, etc.Controllers 116 can form a control plane that interfaces with anapplication plane via northbound APIs and a data plane via southboundAPIs.

As previously noted, Controllers 116 can define and manageapplication-level model(s) for configurations in Network Environment100. In some cases, application or device configurations can also bemanaged and/or defined by other components in the network. For example,a hypervisor or virtual appliance, such as a VM or container, can run aserver or management tool to manage software and services in NetworkEnvironment 100, including configurations and settings for virtualappliances.

As illustrated above, Network Environment 100 can include one or moredifferent types of SDN solutions, hosts, etc. For the sake of clarityand explanation purposes, various examples in the disclosure will bedescribed with reference to an ACI framework, and Controllers 116 may beinterchangeably referenced as controllers, APICs, or APIC controllers.However, it should be noted that the technologies and concepts hereinare not limited to ACI solutions and may be implemented in otherarchitectures and scenarios, including other SDN solutions as well asother types of networks which may not deploy an SDN solution.

Further, as referenced herein, the term “hosts” can refer to Servers 106(e.g., physical or logical), Hypervisors 108, VMs 110, containers (e.g.,Applications 112), etc., and can run or include any type of server orapplication solution. Non-limiting examples of “hosts” can includevirtual switches or routers, such as distributed virtual switches (DVS),application virtual switches (AVS), vector packet processing (VPP)switches; VCENTER and NSX MANAGERS; bare metal physical hosts; HYPER-Vhosts; VMs; DOCKER Containers; etc.

FIG. 1B illustrates another example of Network Environment 100. In thisexample, Network Environment 100 includes Endpoints 122 connected toLeafs 104 in Fabric 120. Endpoints 122 can be physical and/or logical orvirtual entities, such as servers, clients, VMs, hypervisors, softwarecontainers, applications, resources, network devices, workloads, etc.For example, an Endpoint 122 can be an object that represents a physicaldevice (e.g., server, client, switch, etc.), an application (e.g., webapplication, database application, etc.), a logical or virtual resource(e.g., a virtual switch, a virtual service appliance, a virtualizednetwork function (VNF), a VM, a service chain, etc.), a containerrunning a software resource (e.g., an application, an appliance, a VNF,a service chain, etc.), storage, a workload or workload engine, etc.Endpoints 122 can have an address (e.g., an identity), a location (e.g.,host, network segment, virtual routing and forwarding (VRF) instance,domain, etc.), one or more attributes (e.g., name, type, version, patchlevel, OS name, OS type, etc.), a tag (e.g., security tag), a profile,etc.

Endpoints 122 can be associated with respective Logical Groups 118.Logical Groups 118 can be logical entities containing endpoints(physical and/or logical or virtual) grouped together according to oneor more attributes, such as endpoint type (e.g., VM type, workload type,application type, etc.), one or more requirements (e.g., policyrequirements, security requirements, QoS requirements, customerrequirements, resource requirements, etc.), a resource name (e.g., VMname, application name, etc.), a profile, platform or operating system(OS) characteristics (e.g., OS type or name including guest and/or hostOS, etc.), an associated network or tenant, one or more policies, a tag,etc. For example, a logical group can be an object representing acollection of endpoints grouped together. To illustrate, Logical Group 1can contain client endpoints, Logical Group 2 can contain web serverendpoints, Logical Group 3 can contain application server endpoints,Logical Group N can contain database server endpoints, etc. In someexamples, Logical Groups 118 are EPGs in an ACI environment and/or otherlogical groups (e.g., SGs) in another SDN environment.

Traffic to and/or from Endpoints 122 can be classified, processed,managed, etc., based Logical Groups 118. For example, Logical Groups 118can be used to classify traffic to or from Endpoints 122, apply policiesto traffic to or from Endpoints 122, define relationships betweenEndpoints 122, define roles of Endpoints 122 (e.g., whether an endpointconsumes or provides a service, etc.), apply rules to traffic to or fromEndpoints 122, apply filters or access control lists (ACLs) to trafficto or from Endpoints 122, define communication paths for traffic to orfrom Endpoints 122, enforce requirements associated with Endpoints 122,implement security and other configurations associated with Endpoints122, etc.

In an ACI environment, Logical Groups 118 can be EPGs used to definecontracts in the ACI. Contracts can include rules specifying what andhow communications between EPGs take place. For example, a contract candefine what provides a service, what consumes a service, and what policyobjects are related to that consumption relationship. A contract caninclude a policy that defines the communication path and all relatedelements of a communication or relationship between endpoints or EPGs.For example, a Web EPG can provide a service that a Client EPG consumes,and that consumption can be subject to a filter (ACL) and a servicegraph that includes one or more services, such as firewall inspectionservices and server load balancing.

FIG. 2A illustrates a diagram of an example Management Information Model200 for an SDN network, such as Network Environment 100. The followingdiscussion of Management Information Model 200 references various termswhich shall also be used throughout the disclosure. Accordingly, forclarity, the disclosure shall first provide below a list of terminology,which will be followed by a more detailed discussion of ManagementInformation Model 200.

As used herein, an “Alias” can refer to a changeable name for a givenobject. Thus, even if the name of an object, once created, cannot bechanged, the Alias can be a field that can be changed.

As used herein, the term “Aliasing” can refer to a rule (e.g.,contracts, policies, configurations, etc.) that overlaps one or moreother rules. For example, Contract 1 defined in a logical model of anetwork can be said to be aliasing Contract 2 defined in the logicalmodel of the network if Contract 1 overlaps Contract 1. In this example,by aliasing Contract 2, Contract 1 may render Contract 2 redundant orinoperable. For example, if Contract 1 has a higher priority thanContract 2, such aliasing can render Contract 2 redundant based onContract 1's overlapping and higher priority characteristics.

As used herein, the term “APIC” can refer to one or more controllers(e.g., Controllers 116) in an ACI framework. The APIC can provide aunified point of automation and management, policy programming,application deployment, health monitoring for an ACI multitenant fabric.The APIC can be implemented as a single controller, a distributedcontroller, or a replicated, synchronized, and/or clustered controller.

As used herein, the term “BDD” can refer to a binary decision tree. Abinary decision tree can be a data structure representing functions,such as Boolean functions.

As used herein, the term “BD” can refer to a bridge domain. A bridgedomain can be a set of logical ports that share the same flooding orbroadcast characteristics. Like a virtual LAN (VLAN), bridge domains canspan multiple devices. A bridge domain can be a L2 (Layer 2) construct.

As used herein, a “Consumer” can refer to an endpoint, resource, and/orEPG that consumes a service.

As used herein, a “Context” can refer to an L3 (Layer 3) address domainthat allows multiple instances of a routing table to exist and worksimultaneously. This increases functionality by allowing network pathsto be segmented without using multiple devices. Non-limiting examples ofa context or L3 address domain can include a Virtual Routing andForwarding (VRF) instance, a private network, and so forth.

As used herein, the term “Contract” can refer to rules or configurationsthat specify what and how communications in a network are conducted(e.g., allowed, denied, filtered, processed, etc.). In an ACI network,contracts can specify how communications between endpoints and/or EPGstake place. In some examples, a contract can provide rules andconfigurations akin to an Access Control List (ACL).

As used herein, the term “Distinguished Name” (DN) can refer to a uniquename that describes an object, such as an MO, and locates its place inManagement Information Model 200. In some cases, the DN can be (orequate to) a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN).

As used herein, the term “Endpoint Group” (EPG) can refer to a logicalentity or object associated with a collection or group of endpoints aspreviously described with reference to FIG. 1B.

As used herein, the term “Filter” can refer to a parameter orconfiguration for allowing communications. For example, in a whitelistmodel where all communications are blocked by default, a communicationmust be given explicit permission to prevent such communication frombeing blocked. A filter can define permission(s) for one or morecommunications or packets. A filter can thus function similar to an ACLor Firewall rule. In some examples, a filter can be implemented in apacket (e.g., TCP/IP) header field, such as L3 protocol type, L4 (Layer4) ports, and so on, which is used to allow inbound or outboundcommunications between endpoints or EPGs, for example.

As used herein, the term “L2 Out” can refer to a bridged connection. Abridged connection can connect two or more segments of the same networkso that they can communicate. In an ACI framework, an L2 out can be abridged (Layer 2) connection between an ACI fabric (e.g., Fabric 120)and an outside Layer 2 network, such as a switch.

As used herein, the term “L3 Out” can refer to a routed connection. Arouted Layer 3 connection uses a set of protocols that determine thepath that data follows in order to travel across networks from itssource to its destination. Routed connections can perform forwarding(e.g., IP forwarding) according to a protocol selected, such as BGP(border gateway protocol), OSPF (Open Shortest Path First), EIGRP(Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol), etc.

As used herein, the term “Managed Object” (MO) can refer to an abstractrepresentation of objects that are managed in a network (e.g., NetworkEnvironment 100). The objects can be concrete objects (e.g., a switch,server, adapter, etc.), or logical objects (e.g., an applicationprofile, an EPG, a fault, etc.). The MOs can be network resources orelements that are managed in the network. For example, in an ACIenvironment, an MO can include an abstraction of an ACI fabric (e.g.,Fabric 120) resource.

As used herein, the term “Management Information Tree” (MIT) can referto a hierarchical management information tree containing the MOs of asystem. For example, in ACI, the MIT contains the MOs of the ACI fabric(e.g., Fabric 120). The MIT can also be referred to as a ManagementInformation Model (MIM), such as Management Information Model 200.

As used herein, the term “Policy” can refer to one or morespecifications for controlling some aspect of system or networkbehavior. For example, a policy can include a named entity that containsspecifications for controlling some aspect of system behavior. Toillustrate, a Layer 3 Outside Network Policy can contain the BGPprotocol to enable BGP routing functions when connecting Fabric 120 toan outside Layer 3 network.

As used herein, the term “Profile” can refer to the configurationdetails associated with a policy. For example, a profile can include anamed entity that contains the configuration details for implementingone or more instances of a policy. To illustrate, a switch node profilefor a routing policy can contain the switch-specific configurationdetails to implement the BGP routing protocol.

As used herein, the term “Provider” refers to an object or entityproviding a service. For example, a provider can be an EPG that providesa service.

As used herein, the term “Subject” refers to one or more parameters in acontract for defining communications. For example, in ACI, subjects in acontract can specify what information can be communicated and how.Subjects can function similar to ACLs.

As used herein, the term “Tenant” refers to a unit of isolation in anetwork. For example, a tenant can be a secure and exclusive virtualcomputing environment. In ACI, a tenant can be a unit of isolation froma policy perspective, but does not necessarily represent a privatenetwork. Indeed, ACI tenants can contain multiple private networks(e.g., VRFs). Tenants can represent a customer in a service providersetting, an organization or domain in an enterprise setting, or just agrouping of policies.

As used herein, the term “VRF” refers to a virtual routing andforwarding instance. The VRF can define a Layer 3 address domain thatallows multiple instances of a routing table to exist and worksimultaneously. This increases functionality by allowing network pathsto be segmented without using multiple devices. Also known as a contextor private network.

Having described various terms used herein, the disclosure now returnsto a discussion of Management Information Model (MIM) 200 in FIG. 2A. Aspreviously noted, MIM 200 can be a hierarchical management informationtree or MIT. Moreover, MIM 200 can be managed and processed byControllers 116, such as APICs in an ACI. Controllers 116 can enable thecontrol of managed resources by presenting their manageablecharacteristics as object properties that can be inherited according tothe location of the object within the hierarchical structure of themodel.

The hierarchical structure of MIM 200 starts with Policy Universe 202 atthe top (Root) and contains parent and child nodes 116, 204, 206, 208,210, 212. Nodes 116, 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212 in the tree representthe managed objects (MOs) or groups of objects. Each object in thefabric (e.g., Fabric 120) has a unique distinguished name (DN) thatdescribes the object and locates its place in the tree. The Nodes 116,202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212 can include the various MOs, as describedbelow, which contain policies that govern the operation of the system.

Controllers 116

Controllers 116 (e.g., APIC controllers) can provide management, policyprogramming, application deployment, and health monitoring for Fabric120.

Node 204

Node 204 includes a tenant container for policies that enable anadministrator to exercise domain-based access control. Non-limitingexamples of tenants can include:

User tenants defined by the administrator according to the needs ofusers. They contain policies that govern the operation of resources suchas applications, databases, web servers, network-attached storage,virtual machines, and so on.

The common tenant is provided by the system but can be configured by theadministrator. It contains policies that govern the operation ofresources accessible to all tenants, such as firewalls, load balancers,Layer 4 to Layer 7 services, intrusion detection appliances, and so on.

The infrastructure tenant is provided by the system but can beconfigured by the administrator. It contains policies that govern theoperation of infrastructure resources such as the fabric overlay (e.g.,VXLAN). It also enables a fabric provider to selectively deployresources to one or more user tenants. Infrastructure tenant polices canbe configurable by the administrator.

The management tenant is provided by the system but can be configured bythe administrator. It contains policies that govern the operation offabric management functions used for in-band and out-of-bandconfiguration of fabric nodes. The management tenant contains a privateout-of-bound address space for the Controller/Fabric internalcommunications that is outside the fabric data path that provides accessthrough the management port of the switches. The management tenantenables discovery and automation of communications with virtual machinecontrollers.

Node 206

Node 206 can contain access policies that govern the operation of switchaccess ports that provide connectivity to resources such as storage,compute, Layer 2 and Layer 3 (bridged and routed) connectivity, virtualmachine hypervisors, Layer 4 to Layer 7 devices, and so on. If a tenantrequires interface configurations other than those provided in thedefault link, Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP), Link Layer DiscoveryProtocol (LLDP), Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP), or SpanningTree Protocol (STP), an administrator can configure access policies toenable such configurations on the access ports of Leafs 104.

Node 206 can contain fabric policies that govern the operation of theswitch fabric ports, including such functions as Network Time Protocol(NTP) server synchronization, Intermediate System-to-Intermediate SystemProtocol (IS-IS), Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) route reflectors, DomainName System (DNS) and so on. The fabric MO contains objects such aspower supplies, fans, chassis, and so on.

Node 208

Node 208 can contain VM domains that group VM controllers with similarnetworking policy requirements. VM controllers can share virtual space(e.g., VLAN or VXLAN space) and application EPGs. Controllers 116communicate with the VM controller to publish network configurationssuch as port groups that are then applied to the virtual workloads.

Node 210

Node 210 can contain Layer 4 to Layer 7 service integration life cycleautomation framework that enables the system to dynamically respond whena service comes online or goes offline. Policies can provide servicedevice package and inventory management functions.

Node 212

Node 212 can contain access, authentication, and accounting (AAA)policies that govern user privileges, roles, and security domains ofFabric 120.

The hierarchical policy model can fit well with an API, such as a RESTAPI interface. When invoked, the API can read from or write to objectsin the MIT. URLs can map directly into distinguished names that identifyobjects in the MIT. Data in the MIT can be described as a self-containedstructured tree text document encoded in XML or JSON, for example.

FIG. 2B illustrates an example object model 220 for a tenant portion ofMIM 200. As previously noted, a tenant is a logical container forapplication policies that enable an administrator to exercisedomain-based access control. A tenant thus represents a unit ofisolation from a policy perspective, but it does not necessarilyrepresent a private network. Tenants can represent a customer in aservice provider setting, an organization or domain in an enterprisesetting, or just a convenient grouping of policies. Moreover, tenantscan be isolated from one another or can share resources.

Tenant portion 204A of MIM 200 can include various entities, and theentities in Tenant Portion 204A can inherit policies from parententities. Non-limiting examples of entities in Tenant Portion 204A caninclude Filters 240, Contracts 236, Outside Networks 222, Bridge Domains230, VRF Instances 234, and Application Profiles 224.

Bridge Domains 230 can include Subnets 232. Contracts 236 can includeSubjects 238. Application Profiles 224 can contain one or more EPGs 226.Some applications can contain multiple components. For example, ane-commerce application could require a web server, a database server,data located in a storage area network, and access to outside resourcesthat enable financial transactions. Application Profile 224 contains asmany (or as few) EPGs as necessary that are logically related toproviding the capabilities of an application.

EPG 226 can be organized in various ways, such as based on theapplication they provide, the function they provide (such asinfrastructure), where they are in the structure of the data center(such as DMZ), or whatever organizing principle that a fabric or tenantadministrator chooses to use.

EPGs in the fabric can contain various types of EPGs, such asapplication EPGs, Layer 2 external outside network instance EPGs, Layer3 external outside network instance EPGs, management EPGs forout-of-band or in-band access, etc. EPGs 226 can also contain Attributes228, such as encapsulation-based EPGs, IP-based EPGs, or MAC-based EPGs.

As previously mentioned, EPGs can contain endpoints (e.g., EPs 122) thathave common characteristics or attributes, such as common policyrequirements (e.g., security, virtual machine mobility (VMM), QoS, orLayer 4 to Layer 7 services). Rather than configure and manage endpointsindividually, they can be placed in an EPG and managed as a group.

Policies apply to EPGs, including the endpoints they contain. An EPG canbe statically configured by an administrator in Controllers 116, ordynamically configured by an automated system such as VCENTER orOPENSTACK.

To activate tenant policies in Tenant Portion 204A, fabric accesspolicies should be configured and associated with tenant policies.Access policies enable an administrator to configure other networkconfigurations, such as port channels and virtual port channels,protocols such as LLDP, CDP, or LACP, and features such as monitoring ordiagnostics.

FIG. 2C illustrates an example Association 260 of tenant entities andaccess entities in MIM 200. Policy Universe 202 contains Tenant Portion204A and Access Portion 206A. Thus, Tenant Portion 204A and AccessPortion 206A are associated through Policy Universe 202.

Access Portion 206A can contain fabric and infrastructure accesspolicies. Typically, in a policy model, EPGs are coupled with VLANs. Fortraffic to flow, an EPG is deployed on a leaf port with a VLAN in aphysical, VMM, L2 out, L3 out, or Fiber Channel domain, for example.

Access Portion 206A thus contains Domain Profile 236 which can define aphysical, VMM, L2 out, L3 out, or Fiber Channel domain, for example, tobe associated to the EPGs. Domain Profile 236 contains VLAN InstanceProfile 238 (e.g., VLAN pool) and Attacheable Access Entity Profile(AEP) 240, which are associated directly with application EPGs. The AEP240 deploys the associated application EPGs to the ports to which it isattached, and automates the task of assigning VLANs. While a large datacenter can have thousands of active VMs provisioned on hundreds ofVLANs, Fabric 120 can automatically assign VLAN IDs from VLAN pools.This saves time compared with trunking down VLANs in a traditional datacenter.

FIG. 2D illustrates a schematic diagram of example models forimplementing MIM 200. The network assurance models can include L_Model270A (Logical Model), LR_Model 270B (Logical Rendered Model or LogicalRuntime Model), Li_Model 272 (Logical Model for i), Ci_Model 274(Concrete model for i), and Hi_Model 276 (Hardware model or TCAM Modelfor i).

L_Model 270A is the logical representation of the objects and theirrelationships in MIM 200. L_Model 270A can be generated by Controllers116 based on configurations entered in Controllers 116 for the network,and thus represents the configurations of the network at Controllers116. This is the declaration of the “end-state” expression that isdesired when the elements of the network entities (e.g., applications)are connected and Fabric 120 is provisioned by Controllers 116. In otherwords, because L_Model 270A represents the configurations entered inControllers 116, including the objects and relationships in MIM 200, itcan also reflect the “intent” of the administrator: how theadministrator wants the network and network elements to behave.

LR_Model 270B is the abstract model expression that Controllers 116(e.g., APICs in ACI) resolve from L_Model 270A. LR_Model 270B can thusprovide the elemental configuration components that would be deliveredto the physical infrastructure (e.g., Fabric 120) to execute one or morepolicies. For example, LR_Model 270B can be delivered to Leafs 104 inFabric 120 to configure Leafs 104 for communication with attachedEndpoints 122.

Li_Model 272 is a switch-level or switch-specific model obtained fromLogical Model 270A and/or Resolved Model 270B. For example, Li_Model 272can represent the portion of L_Model 270A and/or LR_Model 270Bpertaining to a specific switch or router i. To illustrate, Li_Model 272L₁ can represent the portion of L_Model 270A and/or LR_Model 270Bpertaining to Leaf 1 (104). Thus, Li_Model 272 can be generated fromL_Model 270A and/or LR_Model 270B for one or more switch or routers(e.g., Leafs 104 and/or Spines 102) on Fabric 120.

Ci_Model 274 is the actual in-state configuration at the individualfabric member i (e.g., switch i). In other words, Ci_Model 274 is aswitch-level or switch-specific model that is based on Li_Model 272. Forexample, Controllers 116 can deliver Li_Model 272 to Leaf 1 (104). Leaf1 (104) can take Li_Model 272, which can be specific to Leaf 1 (104),and render the policies in Li_Model 272 into a concrete model, Ci_Model274, that runs on Leaf 1 (104). Leaf 1 (104) can render Li_Model 272 viathe OS on Leaf 1 (104), for example. Thus, Ci_Model 274 can be analogousto compiled software, as it is the form of Li_Model 272 that the switchOS at Leaf 1 (104) can execute.

Hi_Model 276 is also a switch-level or switch-specific model for switchi, but is based on Ci_Model 274 for switch i. Hi_Model 276 is the actualconfiguration (e.g., rules) stored or rendered on the hardware or memory(e.g., TCAM memory) at the individual fabric member i (e.g., switch i).For example, Hi_Model 276 can represent the configurations (e.g., rules)which Leaf 1 (104) stores or renders on the hardware (e.g., TCAM memory)of Leaf 1 (104) based on Ci_Model 274 at Leaf 1 (104). The switch OS atLeaf 1 (104) can render or execute Ci_Model 274, and Leaf 1 (104) canstore or render the configurations from Ci_Model in storage, such as thememory or TCAM at Leaf 1 (104). The configurations from Hi_Model 276stored or rendered by Leaf 1 (104) represent the configurations thatwill be implemented by Leaf 1 (104) when processing traffic.

While Models 272, 274, 276 are shown as device-specific models, similarmodels can be generated or aggregated for a collection of fabric members(e.g., Leafs 104 and/or Spines 102) in Fabric 120. When combined,device-specific models, such as Model 272, Model 274, and/or Model 276,can provide a representation of Fabric 120 that extends beyond aparticular device. For example, in some cases, Li_Model 272, Ci_Model272, and/or Hi_Model 272 associated with some or all individual fabricmembers (e.g., Leafs 104 and Spines 102) can be combined or aggregatedto generate one or more aggregated models based on the individual fabricmembers.

As referenced herein, the terms H Model, T Model, and TCAM Model can beused interchangeably to refer to a hardware model, such as Hi_Model 276.For example, Ti Model, Hi_Model and TCAMi Model may be usedinterchangeably to refer to Hi_Model 276.

Models 270A, 270B, 272, 274, 276 can provide representations of variousaspects of the network or various configuration stages for MIM 200. Forexample, one or more of Models 270A, 270B, 272, 274, 276 can be used togenerate Underlay Model 278 representing one or more aspects of Fabric120 (e.g., underlay topology, routing, etc.), Overlay Model 280representing one or more aspects of the overlay or logical segment(s) ofNetwork Environment 100 (e.g., COOP, MPBGP, tenants, VRFs, VLANs,VXLANs, virtual applications, VMs, hypervisors, virtual switching,etc.), Tenant Model 282 representing one or more aspects of Tenantportion 204A in MIM 200 (e.g., security, forwarding, service chaining,QoS, VRFs, BDs, Contracts, Filters, EPGs, subnets, etc.), ResourcesModel 284 representing one or more resources in Network Environment 100(e.g., storage, computing, VMs, port channels, physical elements, etc.),etc.

In general, L_Model 270A can be the high-level expression of what existsin the LR_Model 270B, which should be present on the concrete devices asCi_Model 274 and Hi_Model 276 expression. If there is any gap betweenthe models, there may be inconsistent configurations or problems.

FIG. 3A illustrates a diagram of an example Assurance Appliance 300 fornetwork assurance. In this example, Assurance Appliance 300 can includek VMs 110 operating in cluster mode. VMs are used in this example forexplanation purposes. However, it should be understood that otherconfigurations are also contemplated herein, such as use of containers,bare metal devices, Endpoints 122, or any other physical or logicalsystems. Moreover, while FIG. 3A illustrates a cluster modeconfiguration, other configurations are also contemplated herein, suchas a single mode configuration (e.g., single VM, container, or server)or a service chain for example.

Assurance Appliance 300 can run on one or more Servers 106, VMs 110,Hypervisors 108, EPs 122, Leafs 104, Controllers 116, or any othersystem or resource. For example, Assurance Appliance 300 can be alogical service or application running on one or more VMs 110 in NetworkEnvironment 100.

The Assurance Appliance 300 can include Data Framework 308, which can bebased on, for example, APACHE APEX and HADOOP. In some cases, assurancechecks can be written as individual operators that reside in DataFramework 308. This enables a natively horizontal scale-out architecturethat can scale to arbitrary number of switches in Fabric 120 (e.g., ACIfabric).

Assurance Appliance 300 can poll Fabric 120 at a configurableperiodicity (e.g., an epoch). The analysis workflow can be setup as aDAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) of Operators 310, where data flows from oneoperator to another and eventually results are generated and persistedto Database 302 for each interval (e.g., each epoch).

The north-tier implements API Server (e.g., APACHE Tomcat and Springframework) 304 and Web Server 306. A graphical user interface (GUI)interacts via the APIs exposed to the customer. These APIs can also beused by the customer to collect data from Assurance Appliance 300 forfurther integration into other tools.

Operators 310 in Data Framework 308 (e.g., APEX/Hadoop) can togethersupport assurance operations. Below are non-limiting examples ofassurance operations that can be performed by Assurance Appliance 300via Operators 310.

Security Policy Adherence

Assurance Appliance 300 can check to make sure the configurations orspecification from L_Model 270A, which may reflect the user's intent forthe network, including for example the security policies andcustomer-configured contracts, are correctly implemented and/or renderedin Li_Model 272, Ci_Model 274, and Hi_Model 276, and thus properlyimplemented and rendered by the fabric members (e.g., Leafs 104), andreport any errors, contract violations, or irregularities found.

Static Policy Analysis

Assurance Appliance 300 can check for issues in the specification of theuser's intent or intents (e.g., identify contradictory or conflictingpolicies in L_Model 270A).

TCAM Utilization

TCAM is a scarce resource in the fabric (e.g., Fabric 120). However,Assurance Appliance 300 can analyze the TCAM utilization by the networkdata (e.g., Longest Prefix Match (LPM) tables, routing tables, VLANtables, BGP updates, etc.), Contracts, Logical Groups 118 (e.g., EPGs),Tenants, Spines 102, Leafs 104, and other dimensions in NetworkEnvironment 100 and/or objects in MIM 200, to provide a network operatoror user visibility into the utilization of this scarce resource. Thiscan greatly help for planning and other optimization purposes.

Endpoint Checks

Assurance Appliance 300 can validate that the fabric (e.g. fabric 120)has no inconsistencies in the Endpoint information registered (e.g., twoleafs announcing the same endpoint, duplicate subnets, etc.), amongother such checks.

Tenant Routing Checks

Assurance Appliance 300 can validate that BDs, VRFs, subnets (bothinternal and external), VLANs, contracts, filters, applications, EPGs,etc., are correctly programmed.

Infrastructure Routing

Assurance Appliance 300 can validate that infrastructure routing (e.g.,IS-IS protocol) has no convergence issues leading to black holes, loops,flaps, and other problems.

MP-BGP Route Reflection Checks

The network fabric (e.g., Fabric 120) can interface with other externalnetworks and provide connectivity to them via one or more protocols,such as Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF),etc. The learned routes are advertised within the network fabric via,for example, MP-BGP. These checks can ensure that a route reflectionservice via, for example, MP-BGP (e.g., from Border Leaf) does not havehealth issues.

Logical Lint and Real-Time Change Analysis

Assurance Appliance 300 can validate rules in the specification of thenetwork (e.g., L_Model 270A) are complete and do not haveinconsistencies or other problems. MOs in the MIM 200 can be checked byAssurance Appliance 300 through syntactic and semantic checks performedon L_Model 270A and/or the associated configurations of the MOs in MIM200. Assurance Appliance 300 can also verify that unnecessary, stale,unused or redundant configurations, such as contracts, are removed.

FIG. 3B illustrates an architectural diagram of an example system 350for network assurance. In some cases, system 350 can correspond to theDAG of Operators 310 previously discussed with respect to FIG. 3A Inthis example, Topology Explorer 312 communicates with Controllers 116(e.g., APIC controllers) in order to discover or otherwise construct acomprehensive topological view of Fabric 120 (e.g., Spines 102, Leafs104, Controllers 116, Endpoints 122, and any other components as well astheir interconnections). While various architectural components arerepresented in a singular, boxed fashion, it is understood that a givenarchitectural component, such as Topology Explorer 312, can correspondto one or more individual Operators 310 and may include one or morenodes or endpoints, such as one or more servers, VMs, containers,applications, service functions (e.g., functions in a service chain orvirtualized network function), etc.

Topology Explorer 312 is configured to discover nodes in Fabric 120,such as Controllers 116, Leafs 104, Spines 102, etc. Topology Explorer312 can additionally detect a majority election performed amongstControllers 116, and determine whether a quorum exists amongstControllers 116. If no quorum or majority exists, Topology Explorer 312can trigger an event and alert a user that a configuration or othererror exists amongst Controllers 116 that is preventing a quorum ormajority from being reached. Topology Explorer 312 can detect Leafs 104and Spines 102 that are part of Fabric 120 and publish theircorresponding out-of-band management network addresses (e.g., IPaddresses) to downstream services. This can be part of the topologicalview that is published to the downstream services at the conclusion ofTopology Explorer's 312 discovery epoch (e.g., 5 minutes, or some otherspecified interval).

Unified Collector 314 can receive the topological view from TopologyExplorer 312 and use the topology information to collect information fornetwork assurance from Fabric 120. Such information can include L_Model270A and/or LR_Model 270B from Controllers 116, switch softwareconfigurations (e.g., Ci_Model 274) from Leafs 104 and/or Spines 102,hardware configurations (e.g., Hi_Model 276) from Leafs 104 and/orSpines 102, etc. Unified Collector 314 can collect Ci_Model 274 andHi_Model 276 from individual fabric members (e.g., Leafs 104 and Spines102).

Unified Collector 314 can poll the devices that Topology Explorer 312discovers in order to collect data from Fabric 120 (e.g., from theconstituent members of the fabric). Unified Collector 314 can collectthe data using interfaces exposed by Controller 116 and/or switchsoftware (e.g., switch OS), including, for example, a RepresentationState Transfer (REST) Interface and a Secure Shell (SSH) Interface.

In some cases, Unified Collector 314 collects L_Model 270A, LR_Model270B, and/or Ci_Model 274 via a REST API, and the hardware information(e.g., configurations, tables, fabric card information, rules, routes,etc.) via SSH using utilities provided by the switch software, such asvirtual shell (VSH or VSHELL) for accessing the switch command-lineinterface (CLI) or VSH_LC shell for accessing runtime state of the linecard.

Unified Collector 314 can poll other information from Controllers 116,including: topology information, tenant forwarding/routing information,tenant security policies, contracts, interface policies, physical domainor VMM domain information, OOB (out-of-band) management IP's of nodes inthe fabric, etc.

Unified Collector 314 can also poll other information from Leafs 104 andSpines 102, such as: Ci Models 274 for VLANs, BDs, security policies,Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) connectivity information of Leafs104 and/or Spines 102, endpoint information from EPM/COOP, fabric cardinformation from Spines 102, routing information base (RIB) tables,forwarding information base (FIB) tables from Leafs 104 and/or Spines102, security group hardware tables (e.g., TCAM tables) from switches,etc.

Assurance Appliance 300 can run one or more instances of UnifiedCollector 314. For example, Assurance Appliance 300 can run one, two,three, or more instances of Unified Collector 314. The task of datacollecting for each node in the topology (e.g., Fabric 120 includingSpines 102, Leafs 104, Controllers 116, etc.) can be sharded or loadbalanced, to a unique instance of Unified Collector 314. Data collectionacross the nodes can thus be performed in parallel by one or moreinstances of Unified Collector 314. Within a given node, commands anddata collection can be executed serially. Assurance Appliance 300 cancontrol the number of threads used by each instance of Unified Collector314 to poll data from Fabric 120.

Data collected by Unified Collector 314 can be compressed and sent todownstream services. In some examples, Unified Collector 314 can collectdata in an online fashion or real-time fashion, and send the datadownstream, as it is collected, for further analysis. In some examples,Unified Collector 314 can collect data in an offline fashion, andcompile the data for later analysis or transmission.

Assurance Appliance 300 can contact Controllers 116, Spines 102, Leafs104, and other nodes to collect various types of data. In somescenarios, Assurance Appliance 300 may experience a failure (e.g.,connectivity problem, hardware or software error, etc.) that prevents itfrom being able to collect data for a period of time. AssuranceAppliance 300 can handle such failures seamlessly, and generate eventsbased on such failures.

Switch Logical Policy Generator 316 can receive L_Model 270A and/orLR_Model 270B from Unified Collector 314 and calculate Li_Model 272 foreach network device i (e.g., switch i) in Fabric 120. For example,Switch Logical Policy Generator 316 can receive L_Model 270A and/orLR_Model 270B and generate Li_Model 272 by projecting a logical modelfor each individual node i (e.g., Spines 102 and/or Leafs 104) in Fabric120. Switch Logical Policy Generator 316 can generate Li_Model 272 foreach switch in Fabric 120, thus creating a switch logical model based onL_Model 270A for each switch.

Switch Logical Configuration Generator 316 can also perform changeanalysis and generate lint events or records for problems discovered inL_Model 270A and/or LR_Model 270B. The lint events or records can beused to generate alerts for a user or network operator.

Policy Operator 318 can receive Ci_Model 274 and Hi_Model 276 for eachswitch from Unified Collector 314, and Li_Model 272 for each switch fromSwitch Logical Policy Generator 316, and perform assurance checks andanalysis (e.g., security adherence checks, TCAM utilization analysis,etc.) based on Ci_Model 274, Hi_Model 276, and Li_Model 272. PolicyOperator 318 can perform assurance checks on a switch-by-switch basis bycomparing one or more of the models.

Returning to Unified Collector 314, Unified Collector 314 can also sendL_Model 270A and/or LR_Model 270B to Routing Policy Parser 320, andCi_Model 274 and Hi_Model 276 to Routing Parser 326.

Routing Policy Parser 320 can receive L_Model 270A and/or LR_Model 270Band parse the model(s) for information that may be relevant todownstream operators, such as Endpoint Checker 322 and Tenant RoutingChecker 324. Similarly, Routing Parser 326 can receive Ci_Model 274 andHi_Model 276 and parse each model for information for downstreamoperators, Endpoint Checker 322 and Tenant Routing Checker 324.

After Ci_Model 274, Hi_Model 276, L_Model 270A and/or LR_Model 270B areparsed, Routing Policy Parser 320 and/or Routing Parser 326 can sendcleaned-up protocol buffers (Proto Buffs) to the downstream operators,Endpoint Checker 322 and Tenant Routing Checker 324. Endpoint Checker322 can then generate events related to Endpoint violations, such asduplicate IPs, APIPA, etc., and Tenant Routing Checker 324 can generateevents related to the deployment of BDs, VRFs, subnets, routing tableprefixes, etc.

FIG. 3C illustrates a schematic diagram of an example system for staticpolicy analysis in a network (e.g., Network Environment 100). StaticPolicy Analyzer 360 can perform assurance checks to detect configurationviolations, logical lint events, contradictory or conflicting policies,unused contracts, incomplete configurations, etc. Static Policy Analyzer360 can check the specification of the user's intent or intents inL_Model 270A to determine if any configurations in Controllers 116 areinconsistent with the specification of the user's intent or intents.

Static Policy Analyzer 360 can include one or more of the Operators 310executed or hosted in Assurance Appliance 300. However, in otherconfigurations, Static Policy Analyzer 360 can run one or more operatorsor engines that are separate from Operators 310 and/or AssuranceAppliance 300. For example, Static Policy Analyzer 360 can be a VM, acluster of VMs, or a collection of endpoints in a service functionchain.

Static Policy Analyzer 360 can receive as input L_Model 270A fromLogical Model Collection Process 366 and Rules 368 defined for eachfeature (e.g., object) in L_Model 270A. Rules 368 can be based onobjects, relationships, definitions, configurations, and any otherfeatures in MIM 200. Rules 368 can specify conditions, relationships,parameters, and/or any other information for identifying configurationviolations or issues.

Moreover, Rules 368 can include information for identifying syntacticviolations or issues. For example, Rules 368 can include one or morerules for performing syntactic checks. Syntactic checks can verify thatthe configuration of L_Model 270A is complete, and can help identifyconfigurations or rules that are not being used. Syntactic checks canalso verify that the configurations in the hierarchical MIM 200 arecomplete (have been defined) and identify any configurations that aredefined but not used. To illustrate, Rules 368 can specify that everytenant in L_Model 270A should have a context configured configured;every contract in L_Model 270A should specify a provider EPG and aconsumer EPG; every contract in L_Model 270A should specify a subject,filter, and/or port; etc.

Rules 368 can also include rules for performing semantic checks andidentifying semantic violations or issues. Semantic checks can checkconflicting rules or configurations. For example, Rule1 and Rule2 canhave aliasing issues, Rule1 can be more specific than Rule2 and therebycreate conflicts/issues, etc. Rules 368 can define conditions which mayresult in aliased rules, conflicting rules, etc. To illustrate, Rules368 can specify that an allow policy for a specific communicationbetween two objects can conflict with a deny policy for the samecommunication between two objects if the allow policy has a higherpriority than the deny policy, or a rule for an object renders anotherrule unnecessary.

Static Policy Analyzer 360 can apply Rules 368 to L_Model 270A to checkconfigurations in L_Model 270A and output Configuration Violation Events370 (e.g., alerts, logs, notifications, etc.) based on any issuesdetected. Configuration Violation Events 370 can include semantic orsemantic problems, such as incomplete configurations, conflictingconfigurations, aliased rules, unused configurations, errors, policyviolations, misconfigured objects, incomplete configurations, incorrectcontract scopes, improper object relationships, etc.

In some cases, Static Policy Analyzer 360 can iteratively traverse eachnode in a tree generated based on L_Model 270A and/or MIM 200, and applyRules 368 at each node in the tree to determine if any nodes yield aviolation (e.g., incomplete configuration, improper configuration,unused configuration, etc.). Static Policy Analyzer 360 can outputConfiguration Violation Events 370 when it detects any violations.

FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart for an example network assurance method.The method shown in FIG. 4 is provided by way of example, as there are avariety of ways to carry out the method. Additionally, while the examplemethod is illustrated with a particular order of blocks, those ofordinary skill in the art will appreciate that FIG. 4 and the blocksshown therein can be executed in any order and can include fewer or moreblocks than illustrated.

Each block shown in FIG. 4 represents one or more steps, processes,methods or routines in the method. For the sake of clarity andexplanation purposes, the blocks in FIG. 4 are described with referenceto Assurance Appliance 300, Models 270A-B, 272, 274, 276, and NetworkEnvironment 100, as shown in FIGS. 1A-B, 2D, and 3A.

At step 400, Assurance Appliance 300 can collect data and obtain modelsassociated with Network Environment 100. The models can include Models270A-B, 272, 274, 276. The data can include fabric data (e.g., topology,switch, interface policies, application policies, EPGs, etc.), networkconfigurations (e.g., BDs, VRFs, L2 Outs, L3 Outs, protocolconfigurations, etc.), security configurations (e.g., contracts,filters, etc.), service chaining configurations, routing configurations,and so forth. Other information collected or obtained can include, forexample, network data (e.g., RIB/FIB, VLAN, MAC, ISIS, DB, BGP, OSPF,ARP, VPC, LLDP, MTU, QoS, etc.), rules and tables (e.g., TCAM rules,ECMP tables, etc.), endpoint dynamics (e.g., EPM, COOP EP DB, etc.),statistics (e.g., TCAM rule hits, interface counters, bandwidth, etc.).

At step 402, Assurance Appliance 300 can analyze and model the receiveddata and models. For example, Assurance Appliance 300 can perform formalmodeling and analysis, which can involve determining equivalency betweenmodels, including configurations, policies, etc.

At step 404, Assurance Appliance 300 can generate one or more smartevents. Assurance Appliance 300 can generate smart events using deepobject hierarchy for detailed analysis, such as Tenants, switches, VRFs,rules, filters, routes, prefixes, ports, contracts, subjects, etc.

At step 406, Assurance Appliance 300 can visualize the smart events,analysis and/or models. Assurance Appliance 300 can display problems andalerts for analysis and debugging, in a user-friendly GUI.

FIG. 5 provides another type of network assurance check involvinglocalizing faults in large-scale network policy deployment. Inparticular, FIG. 5 provides an example method 500 for identifying policyobjects that are likely responsible for failures that occur duringnetwork policy deployment. As noted above, a network policy dictates howtraffic should be treated in a network (e.g. the network environment100). To enable management of a network policy, in some instances, anetwork policy may be abstracted into a model, such as graph-like datastructure or tree-like data structure. The model may contain one or moremanageable policy objects that logically describes communicationrelationships among physical/logical entities of the network environment100, such as servers, switches, VMs, EPGs and the like.

Each policy object represents a reusable, collection of elements, whichenables a particular functionality and/or otherwise defines a particularcomponent or function, etc., of the network environment 100. Examplepolicy objects include EPGs, Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF),contract(s), filter(s), etc. Any given object can be used by otherobjects and network policies. Thus, when a given policy object isreferenced in a given network policy, the policy object may becomeintegrated, meaning that if a change is made to the definition of thepolicy object, the change is reflected in all other policy objects andnetwork policies that reference the changed object. Stated differently,the relationship among policy objects dictates how a network policy maybe realized. So if an object is absent or ill-represented in any of thecontroller(s), switches and/or TCAM layers, all of the EPG pairs thatrely on that policy object will be negatively impacted. Thus, thesepolicy objects on which a set of EPG pairs rely are considered sharedrisks in the network policy deployment.

As noted above, a controller (e.g., controller 116) manages deploymentof a network policy, by for example, compiling a network policy anddistributing corresponding instructions to switches that directlyconnect to endpoints belonging to the EPGs in the network policy. Uponreceipt of the instructions, the switch (e.g., via switch agent) updatesits logical view and renders ACL rules into the TCAM. During thedeployment process, there are two major locations that eventually causethe failure of a TCAM rule update: 1) when updating from controller toswitch; and 2) when updating from switch to TCAM. The first may causeglobal faults in the network whereas the second is generally associatedwith local faults. For instance, if the controller cannot reach out to alarge number of switches for some reason, the policy objects associatedwith the unreachable switches are not updated. Alternatively, when oneswitch is unreachable (e.g., a switch agent misbehaves or TCAM hashardware glitches) the scope of risk model should be restricted to aparticular switch level.

Referring specifically to the steps of FIG. 5, a process 500 isillustrated, where a fault or a failure is detected in a network policydeployed in a network (e.g., in the network environment 100). Todetermine a fault, at 502, network policy rule data deployed acrossdevices (e.g., all switches) of a network are periodically collectedand/or collected in an event-driven fashion. For example, TCAM rulesand/or TCAM rule data across switches may be obtained.

At 504, the obtained TCAM rules are processed to conduct an equivalencecheck between the logical model and/or the network policy (e.g., at thecontroller 116) and the collected TCAM rules (i.e., the hardware modelto TCAM model). The equivalence check resolves the relationships amongpolicy objects in the network policy and generates per-switch logicalTCAM rules (L-type). A logical TCAM rule is treated as missing, if itmeets any of the following two conditions: (1) a corresponding switchTCAM rule is not present; and (2) the rule is present but violates thenetwork policy. An example of a network policy violation is that a ruleconfigured as “allow” is programmed as “deny” in a switch TCAM rules andvice versa. Thus, the equivalence check detects inconsistency betweenthe desired state (i.e., the network policy) and actual state (i.e., thecollected TCAM rules) and produces or otherwise outputs missing TCAMrules (the rules that should have been deployed in the TCAM but areabsent from the TCAM and hence, violating the network policy) acrossswitches.

At 506, one or more risk models are generated that represents a risk(s)associated with the deployment of the network policy throughout oracross the various components of the network environment 100, such asthe controller(s), switch(es) and TCAM(s).

In some instances, a Switch Risk Model may be generated. The Switch RiskModel identifies policy objects that violate a network policy ordeteriorate communication between endpoints at a switch level. A SwitchRisk Model consists of shared risks (i.e., policy objects) and theelements (i.e., EPG pair) that can be impacted by the shared risks on aper-switch basis. The model is built from a network policy and thephysical locations of endpoints belonging to EPGs in the network. FIG.6A illustrates an example Model 600, of a Switch risk model for switchesS2. As illustrated, the left-hand side in the Model (a) shows all EPGpairs deployed in switch S2, including Web-App 604 and App-DB 606. EachEPG pair (i.e., Web-App 604 and App-DB 606) has an edge to those policyobjects (illustrated on the right-hand side in the model at 602) that itrelies on in order to allow traffic between endpoints in the EPG pair.For instance, the Web-App EPG pair 604 has outgoing edges to EPG:Web,EPG:App, VRF:101, Filter:port80/Allow, and Contract:Web-App. As anotherexample, the App-DB EPG pair 506 has outgoing edges to EPG:App, VRF:101,Filter:port80/Allow, Contract:Web-App, and Filter: port 700/allow. Anedge is flagged as either success or fail.

Referring generally again to FIG. 5 at 506, in addition to a Switch RiskModel, a Controller Risk Model may be generated. The Controller RiskModel describes risk across switches in an entire network. A ControllerRisk Model captures shared risks and their relationships with vulnerableelements (i.e., switch-EPG tuple in Model (b)) across all switches inthe network. If an EPG has endpoints connected to more than one switch,the same set of policy objects that has relationship with an EPGrequires to be deployed in those switches. If an object from the set isnot deployed in many of those switches, it is highly likely that theproblem is at the controller side. The Controller Risk Model is designedto help fault localization of the deployment failure between thecontroller and switches.

In the Controller Risk Model, a switch ID and an EPG pair form a triplet(on the left-hand side) is illustrated. A triplet has edges to policyobjects that the EPG pair relies on in that specified switch. Since thesame policy object can be present in more than one switch, an EPG pairin multiple switches can have an edge to the object. FIG. 6B illustratesan example Model 620, of a Controller Risk Model for switches S1, S2,and S3. As illustrated, the Model 620, for example, shows the Web-AppEPG pair in all three switches (S₁, S₂, and S₃) (illustrated at 622) hasthe following edges (illustrated at 624): EPG:Web, EPG:App,Contract:Web-App, Filter:port 80/Allow and VRF:101.

Referring again to FIG. 5, at 508, the generated risk models may beaugmented with the missing TCAM rules output from the equivalency check.Stated differently, the missing TCAM rules are represented in the riskmodels as a failure. For example, a TCAM rule may consist of severalpolicy objects. Thus, when a rule is determined to be missing, it may behard to tell which specific policy object(s) contributed to the problemand it is expensive to do object-by-object checking across all TCAMrules. Alternatively, it may be that the missing TCAM rule was notdeployed at all due to TCAM overflow. Thus, rather than performingobject-by-object checking of all the objects in a rule, all of theobjects in the missing TCAM rule are initially treated as a failure andthe edges between the policy objects and EPG pairs (and Switch-EPGtuple) are marked (augmented) as fail in the generated risk models.

For example, an EPG pair (or switch-EPG tuples associated with the EPGpair across switches) will be marked as a fail, if it has at least onefailed edge between the pair and a policy object. Otherwise, the EPGpair is considered a success. Each EPG pair node marked as fail is anobservation. A set of observations is called a failure signature. Anypolicy object shared across multiple EPG pairs becomes a shared risk. Ifall edges to a policy object are marked as fail, it is highly likelythat the failure of deploying that policy object explains theobservations present in the failure signature, and such a policy objectis added to a set called a hypothesis.

At 510, based on the augmented risk models (i.e., the Switch risk modeland/or the Controller risk model), a subset of the policy objects areidentified that are most likely to be responsible for or otherwiseassociated with faults or failures in the network. Initially, in someinstances, a greedy algorithm may be executed to identify policy objectsto maximize two utility values—(i) hit ratio and (ii) coverageratio—computed for each policy object.

In such an algorithm, Let Gi be a set of EPG pairs that depend on ashared risk i, Oi be a subset of Gi in which EPG pairs are marked asfail (observations), and F be the failure signature, a set that containsall observations, i.e., F=u Oi for all i. For the given shared risk i, ahit ratio, hi is defined as:hi=|Gi∩Oi|/|Gi|

Stated differently, a hit ratio is a fraction of EPG pairs that areobservations out of all EPG pairs that depend on a shared risk. A hitratio is 1 when all EPG pairs that depend on a shared risk are marked asfail. And a coverage ratio, ci is defined as:ci=|Gi∩O _(i) |/|F|

A coverage ratio denotes a fraction of failed EPG pairs associated witha shared risk from the failure signature.

The greedy algorithm first identifies a set of policy objects (i.e.,shared risks) to examine based on the values of hit ratio. In an idealcase, those values should be 1. However, in practice, perfect failureinformation is usually unavailable to the algorithm, which makes the hitratio less than 1. To cope with such a real constraint, the algorithmmay inspect shared risks whose hit ratio is above some fixed thresholdvalue.

Next, given the set of shared risks chosen from the previous step, thealgorithm selects the shared risks (i.e., policy objects) with thehighest coverage ratio values. In particular, the generated risk models(operation 504) may be provided as input to a Fault Location Algorithmto identify a subset of policy objects (e.g., from the pool of policyobjects determined by the greedy algorithm) that are likely responsiblefor faults and/or failures in the network. Algorithm 1 and 2 includedbelow provide an illustration of a Fault Location Algorithm according toone embodiment.

Algorithm 1 SCOUT (F, R, C)  1:

 F: failure signature, R: risk model, C: change logs  2:

 P: unexplained set, Q: explained set, H: hypothesis  3: P ← F; Q ← ∅; H← ∅  4: while P ≠ ∅ do  5:  K ← ∅

 K: a set of shared risks  6:  for observation o ∈ P do  7: objs ←getFailedObjects(o,R)  8: updateHitCovRatio(objs,R)  9: K ← K∪objs 10: end for 11:  faultySet ← pickCandidates(K) 12:  if faultySet = ∅ then13: break 14:  end if 15:  affected ← GetNodes(faultySet,R) 16:  R ←Prune(affected,R) 17:  P ← P\affected; Q ← Q∪affected 18:  H ←H∪faultySet 19: end while 20: if P ≠ ∅ then 21:  for observation o ∈ Pdo 22: objs ← lookupChangeLog(o,R,C) 23: H ← H∪objs 24:  end for 25: endif 26: return H Algorithm 2 pickCandidates(riskVector) 1: hitSet ← ∅ 2:maxCovSet ← ∅ 3: for risk r ∈ riskVector do 4:  if hitRatio(r) = 1 then5: hitSet ← hitSet∪{r} 6:  end if 7: end for 8: maxCovSet ←getMaxCovSet(hitSet) 9: return maxCovSet

Algorithm 1 shows the core part of the Fault Localization Algorithm. Thealgorithm takes failure signature F and risk model R as input. F has aset of observations, e.g., EPG pairs marked as a fault or failure in therisk model, such as in the Switch Risk Model. For each observation in F,the algorithm obtains a list of policy objects with fail edges in theobservation and computes utility values (i.e., hit and coverage ratios)for all those objects (lines 6-10). Then, based on the utility values ofpolicy objects (i.e., shared risks) in the model, the Fault LocalizationAlgorithm picks a subset of the policy objects (i.e., shared risks) andtreats them as faulty (line 11 and Algorithm 2).

In Algorithm 2, if the hit ratio of a policy object (i.e., shared risk)is 1, the risk is included in a candidate risk set (lines 3-7); and thenfrom the candidate set, the policy objects (i.e., shared risks) thathave the highest coverage ratio values are chosen as a set of policyobjects (i.e., shared risks) that covers a maximum number of unexplainedobservations (line 8). This group is referred to in Algorithm 1 asfaultySet.

If faultySet is not empty, all EPG pairs that have an edge to any policyobject (i.e., shared risk) in the faultySet are pruned from the model(lines 15-16), and failed EPG pairs (observations) are moved fromunexplained to explained (line 17). Finally, all the policy object(i.e., shared risk) in the faultySet are added to the hypothesis set, H.This process repeats until either there are no more observations leftunexplained or when faultySet is empty.

There are chances that some observations remain unexplained because theshared risks associated with those observations have a hit ratio lessthan 1 and thus are not selected during the above candidate selectionprocedure. To handle the remaining unexplained observations, the FaultLocation Algorithm searches the change logs of the controllers (i.e.,logs identifying changes made to objects), and selects the objects towhich some actions are recently applied (lines 21-24 in Algorithm 1).

The lines 4-19 in Algorithm 1 cover the following: (i) filter F2 isidentified as a candidate because it has the highest coverage ratioamong the shared risks with a hit ratio of 1; (ii) all the EPG pairsthat depend on F2 are pruned from the model; (iii) and F2 is added tohypothesis. The lines 21-24 ensure that the algorithm adds filter F3(assuming F3 is lately modified) to hypothesis since there are no sharedrisks with a hit ratio of 1.

Various examples of fault localization will now be provided.

TCAM overflow: Due to TCAM overflow, several filters may not be deployedat TCAM. Assume a switch “A” is being tested for faults. Switch Agenerated fault logs that indicate that there is a TCAM overflow whenTCAM utilization is beyond a certain level. To identify the fault, thesystem first localized the faulty filter objects with risk models,correlated them with the change logs for ‘add filter’ instruction, andthen correlated the change logs with the fault logs. The system includeddata describing the fault signature of TCAM overflow, so the system canautomatically match the fault logs with that signature and tag thosefailed filters accordingly.

Unresponsive switch: In this use case, assume switch A becameunresponsive while the controller was sending the ‘add filter’instructions to the switch. The equivalence checker reported that therules associated with some filters are missing. Then, the SCOUTalgorithm localized those filters as faulty objects. Using filtercreation times from the change logs and the fault logs that indicate theswitch was inactive (both maintained at the controller), the correlationengine was able to detect that filters were created when the switch wasinactive.

Too many missing rules: As a variant of the above scenario, a policywith a large number of policy objects was pushed onto an unresponsiveswitch. In such a scenario, more than 300K missing rules were reportedby the equivalence checker. Without fault localization, it is extremelychallenging for network admins to correlate and identify the set ofunderlying objects that are fundamentally responsible for the problem.The algorithms discussed herein were able to automatically identify andreport the unresponsive switch as the root cause behind these huge

The disclosure now turns to FIGS. 6 and 7, which illustrate examplenetwork devices and computing devices, such as switches, routers, loadbalancers, client devices, and so forth.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example network device 700 suitable for performingswitching, routing, load balancing, and other networking operations.Network device 700 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 704,interfaces 702, and a bus 710 (e.g., a PCI bus). When acting under thecontrol of appropriate software or firmware, the CPU 704 is responsiblefor executing packet management, error detection, and/or routingfunctions. The CPU 704 preferably accomplishes all these functions underthe control of software including an operating system and anyappropriate applications software. CPU 704 may include one or moreprocessors 708, such as a processor from the INTEL X86 family ofmicroprocessors. In some cases, processor 708 can be specially designedhardware for controlling the operations of network device 700. In somecases, a memory 706 (e.g., non-volatile RAM, ROM, etc.) also forms partof CPU 704. However, there are many different ways in which memory couldbe coupled to the system.

The interfaces 702 are typically provided as modular interface cards(sometimes referred to as “line cards”). Generally, they control thesending and receiving of data packets over the network and sometimessupport other peripherals used with the network device 700. Among theinterfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relayinterfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, andthe like. In addition, various very high-speed interfaces may beprovided such as fast token ring interfaces, wireless interfaces,Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSIinterfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces, WIFI interfaces, 3G/4G/5Gcellular interfaces, CAN BUS, LoRA, and the like. Generally, theseinterfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with theappropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independentprocessor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independentprocessors may control such communications intensive tasks as packetswitching, media control, signal processing, crypto processing, andmanagement. By providing separate processors for the communicationsintensive tasks, these interfaces allow the master microprocessor 704 toefficiently perform routing computations, network diagnostics, securityfunctions, etc.

Although the system shown in FIG. 7 is one specific network device ofthe present invention, it is by no means the only network devicearchitecture on which the present invention can be implemented. Forexample, an architecture having a single processor that handlescommunications as well as routing computations, etc., is often used.Further, other types of interfaces and media could also be used with thenetwork device 700.

Regardless of the network device's configuration, it may employ one ormore memories or memory modules (including memory 706) configured tostore program instructions for the general-purpose network operationsand mechanisms for roaming, route optimization and routing functionsdescribed herein. The program instructions may control the operation ofan operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. Thememory or memories may also be configured to store tables such asmobility binding, registration, and association tables, etc. Memory 706could also hold various software containers and virtualized executionenvironments and data.

The network device 700 can also include an application-specificintegrated circuit (ASIC), which can be configured to perform routingand/or switching operations. The ASIC can communicate with othercomponents in the network device 700 via the bus 710, to exchange dataand signals and coordinate various types of operations by the networkdevice 700, such as routing, switching, and/or data storage operations,for example.

FIG. 8 illustrates a computing system architecture 800 wherein thecomponents of the system are in electrical communication with each otherusing a connection 805, such as a bus. Exemplary system 800 includes aprocessing unit (CPU or processor) 810 and a system connection 805 thatcouples various system components including the system memory 815, suchas read only memory (ROM) 820 and random access memory (RAM) 825, to theprocessor 810. The system 800 can include a cache of high-speed memoryconnected directly with, in close proximity to, or integrated as part ofthe processor 810. The system 800 can copy data from the memory 815and/or the storage device 830 to the cache 812 for quick access by theprocessor 810. In this way, the cache can provide a performance boostthat avoids processor 810 delays while waiting for data. These and othermodules can control or be configured to control the processor 810 toperform various actions. Other system memory 815 may be available foruse as well. The memory 815 can include multiple different types ofmemory with different performance characteristics. The processor 810 caninclude any general purpose processor and a hardware or softwareservice, such as service 1 832, service 2 834, and service 3 836 storedin storage device 830, configured to control the processor 810 as wellas a special-purpose processor where software instructions areincorporated into the actual processor design. The processor 810 may bea completely self-contained computing system, containing multiple coresor processors, a bus, memory controller, cache, etc. A multi-coreprocessor may be symmetric or asymmetric.

To enable user interaction with the computing device 800, an inputdevice 845 can represent any number of input mechanisms, such as amicrophone for speech, a touch-sensitive screen for gesture or graphicalinput, keyboard, mouse, motion input, speech and so forth. An outputdevice 835 can also be one or more of a number of output mechanismsknown to those of skill in the art. In some instances, multimodalsystems can enable a user to provide multiple types of input tocommunicate with the computing device 800. The communications interface840 can generally govern and manage the user input and system output.There is no restriction on operating on any particular hardwarearrangement and therefore the basic features here may easily besubstituted for improved hardware or firmware arrangements as they aredeveloped.

Storage device 830 is a non-volatile memory and can be a hard disk orother types of computer readable media which can store data that areaccessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memorycards, solid state memory devices, digital versatile disks, cartridges,random access memories (RAMs) 825, read only memory (ROM) 820, andhybrids thereof.

The storage device 830 can include services 832, 834, 836 forcontrolling the processor 810. Other hardware or software modules arecontemplated. The storage device 830 can be connected to the systemconnection 805. In one aspect, a hardware module that performs aparticular function can include the software component stored in acomputer-readable medium in connection with the necessary hardwarecomponents, such as the processor 810, connection 805, output device835, and so forth, to carry out the function.

For clarity of explanation, in some instances the present technology maybe presented as including individual functional blocks includingfunctional blocks comprising devices, device components, steps orroutines in a method embodied in software, or combinations of hardwareand software.

In some embodiments the computer-readable storage devices, mediums, andmemories can include a cable or wireless signal containing a bit streamand the like. However, when mentioned, non-transitory computer-readablestorage media expressly exclude media such as energy, carrier signals,electromagnetic waves, and signals per se.

Methods according to the above-described examples can be implementedusing computer-executable instructions that are stored or otherwiseavailable from computer readable media. Such instructions can comprise,for example, instructions and data which cause or otherwise configure ageneral purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purposeprocessing device to perform a certain function or group of functions.Portions of computer resources used can be accessible over a network.The computer executable instructions may be, for example, binaries,intermediate format instructions such as assembly language, firmware, orsource code. Examples of computer-readable media that may be used tostore instructions, information used, and/or information created duringmethods according to described examples include magnetic or opticaldisks, flash memory, USB devices provided with non-volatile memory,networked storage devices, and so on.

Devices implementing methods according to these disclosures can comprisehardware, firmware and/or software, and can take any of a variety ofform factors. Typical examples of such form factors include laptops,smart phones, small form factor personal computers, personal digitalassistants, rackmount devices, standalone devices, and so on.Functionality described herein also can be embodied in peripherals oradd-in cards. Such functionality can also be implemented on a circuitboard among different chips or different processes executing in a singledevice, by way of further example.

The instructions, media for conveying such instructions, computingresources for executing them, and other structures for supporting suchcomputing resources are means for providing the functions described inthese disclosures.

Although a variety of examples and other information was used to explainaspects within the scope of the appended claims, no limitation of theclaims should be implied based on particular features or arrangements insuch examples, as one of ordinary skill would be able to use theseexamples to derive a wide variety of implementations. Further andalthough some subject matter may have been described in languagespecific to examples of structural features and/or method steps, it isto be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claimsis not necessarily limited to these described features or acts. Forexample, such functionality can be distributed differently or performedin components other than those identified herein. Rather, the describedfeatures and steps are disclosed as examples of components of systemsand methods within the scope of the appended claims.

Claim language reciting “at least one of” refers to at least one of aset and indicates that one member of the set or multiple members of theset satisfy the claim. For example, claim language reciting “at leastone of A and B” means A, B, or A and B.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method, comprising: receiving, from acontroller, a global logical model containing instructions on how one ormore network devices connected within a network fabric communicatewithin the network fabric; receiving, from the one or more networkdevices within the network fabric, a hardware model that models at leasta subset of device specific instructions implemented by the one or morenetwork devices and derived from the global logical model, the at leastthe subset of instructions being specific to hardware operability of theone or more network devices; determining that the received hardwaremodel is missing a rule in response to either the rule being present inthe global logical model but not the received hardware model, or therule as present in the received hardware model conflicts with thereceived global logical model; generating a first risk model fordeployment of the global logical model throughout the network fabric;generating a second risk model, comprising augmenting the first riskmodel to reflect a failure in the global logical model caused by themissing rule; and identifying, based on the second risk model, at leastone cause of failure in the network fabric.
 2. The method of claim 1,wherein the rule is a TCAM rule.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein thefirst risk model identifies policy objects that violate a networkpolicy.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first risk model definesrisk across switches of the network fabric.
 5. The method of claim 1,wherein augmenting the first risk model to reflect a failure in theglobal logical model caused by the missing rule comprises treating allobjects in the missing rule as a failure.
 6. A system, comprising: oneor more processors; and at least one non-transitory computer readablememory storing instructions which, when executed by the one or moreprocessors, cause the one or more processors to: receive, from acontroller, a global logical model containing instructions on how one ormore network devices connected within a network fabric communicatewithin the network fabric; receive, from the one or more network deviceswithin the network fabric, a hardware model that models at least asubset of device specific instructions implemented by the one or morenetwork devices and derived from the global logical model, the at leastthe subset of instructions being specific to hardware operability of theone or more network devices; determining that the received hardwaremodel is missing a rule in response to either the rule being present inthe global logical model but not the received hardware model, or therule as present in the received hardware model conflicts with thereceived global logical model; generate a first risk model fordeployment of the global logical model throughout the network fabric;generate a second risk model, comprising augmenting the first risk modelto reflect a failure in the global logical model caused by the missingrule; and identify, based on the second risk model, at least one causeof failure in the network fabric.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein therule is a TCAM rule.
 8. The system of claim 6, wherein the first riskmodel identifies policy objects that violate a network policy.
 9. Thesystem of claim 6, wherein the first risk model defines risk acrossswitches of the network fabric.
 10. The system of claim 6, whereinaugmenting the first risk model to reflect a failure in the globallogical model caused by the missing rule comprises treating all objectsin the missing rule as a failure.
 11. A non-transitory computer readablemedia storing instructions which when executed by a processor programmedto cooperate with the instructions cause the processor to performoperations comprising: receive, from a controller, a global logicalmodel containing instructions on how one or more network devicesconnected within a network fabric communicate within the network fabric;receive, from the one or more network devices within the network fabric,a hardware model that models at least a subset of device specificinstructions implemented by the one or more network devices and derivedfrom the global logical model, the at least the subset of instructionsbeing specific to hardware operability of the one or more networkdevices; determining that the received hardware model is missing a rulein response to either the rule being present in the global logical modelbut not the received hardware model, or the rule as present in thereceived hardware model conflicts with the received global logicalmodel; generate a first risk model for deployment of the global logicalmodel throughout the network fabric; generate a second risk model,comprising augmenting the first risk model to reflect a failure in theglobal logical model caused by the missing rule; and identify, based onthe second risk model, at least one cause of failure in the networkfabric.
 12. The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 11,wherein the rule is a TCAM rule.
 13. The non-transitory computerreadable media of claim 11, wherein the first risk model identifiespolicy objects that violate a network policy.
 14. The non-transitorycomputer readable media of claim 11, wherein the first risk modeldefines risk across switches of the network fabric.
 15. Thenon-transitory computer readable media of claim 11, wherein augmentingthe first risk model to reflect a failure in the global logical modelcaused by the missing rule comprises treating all objects in the missingrule as a failure.